|
|
Three
Mile Island: The Inside Story
INEEL’s Core Topography Survey System
|
Figure
6.1. This drawing of the upper part of the TMI-2
reactor vessel and work platform atop it shows
the 44-foot (13 m) long boom extending down
from the work platform above the reactor through
the central control rod leadscrew channel to
the top of the upper grid structure.
Learn
more |
|
|
The “Quick Look” video peek inside the reactor’s
core in July and August 1982 necessitated rethinking the cleanup
operation. Remediation was going to be much less straightforward
than had been generally supposed. In order to carry through that
remediation—in order simply to estimate what it was going
to take in time, technology, and money to clean up inside the reactor—much
more information would be needed about the condition of every structure
within the reactor vessel.
That was the basis of the utility’s interest in cooperating
in the gathering of more information, though it remained a grudging
interest if it did not provide the vividness of video pictures.
The Department of Energy and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission saw
such information-gathering efforts as essential for understanding
what had actually happened inside TMI-2 in those first hours of
the accident—which is to say, for understanding the results
of an experiment that they could never choose to do, but whose results
were of great interest to them in anticipating the consequences
of future accidents.
Ultrasonic imaging was a well-established technique in the reactor
field, being commonly used to search for defects in materials and
construction. It was considered early on to examine damage to the
reactor’s fuel rods, but there was no practicable way to put
it into play. Likewise, a “sonar” system, i.e., an echo-location
system based on ultrasonic pulses, had been considered right from
the start as a way to look around inside the reactor vessel. It
was recognized that sonar would have an advantage over video if
the water filling the reactor vessel were murky—as it was
expected to be, and in fact was. But weighing decisively against
sonar was the belief that the fuel rod assemblies were still intact,
or at least largely intact. In that case the multiplicity and proximity
of echoing surfaces would make the sonar data uninterpretable (ref.
12, ch. 5).
The discovery that there was a large void in the core of the reactor
made the feasibility, indeed the indispensability, of an echo-location
survey beyond question. A team was put together from the Department
of Energy’s Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory.
Located on a high-desert reservation almost as large as the state
of Rhode Island, this facility was established as the National Reactor
Testing Station shortly after World War II (ref. 22). By the early
1980s, it was INEL, “Environmental” not having yet been
added to its name (and it remains to this day INEL on the Internet).
INEEL was the principal DoE laboratory involved in the analysis
and cleanup of the TMI-2 accident, and maintained a field office
there for the entire ten years the operation lasted.
The sonar survey team was managed by Michael R. Martin, a metallurgical
engineer by training, who had been involved right from the start
in the analysis of the damage to the reactor, and who would remain
involved in advising and assisting on the cleanup of the core right
to the end. The ultrasonic expertise was provided chiefly by Larry
S. Beller, who had many years of experience with ultrasonic inspection
and imaging of solid materials. But neither he, nor anyone else
had built a system to work at the required range or provide images
of the desired sort. (Beller was the principal author of the final
report of the project, ref. 2, from which details given here of
design and operation are taken.) In just four and one half months,
the entire data collection system was designed, fabricated, and
thoroughly tested, including creation of the software and training
of personnel in procedures for setting up and operating the system
at TMI-2.
Figure
6.2. At the front and at the
center of the core topography survey was the
probe.
Learn
more |
|
|
|
INEEL’s core topography survey system was
the most technically advanced purpose-built system that had been
used for analysis or remediation at TMI-2 up to that time, August
1983. While employing the same work platform and the central control
rod access port utilized by “Quick Look,” INEEL’s
sonar system—in contrast to that and all subsequent video
inspections—was designed to minimize radiation exposure of
personnel by remote operation and, further, by using for that remote
control only such cabling as was already in place in the reactor
building.
Once the mechanical components and interfacing electronics were
set up on the work platform above the reactor, all personnel were
to leave the containment building and the system was to be operated—for
the most part automatically by a Digital Equipment Company minicomputer—from
the auxiliary building that housed the reactor’s control room.
Stepping motors controlled by that computer effected the rotation
and vertical motion of the pulse-echo probe, with the precise vertical
position and horizontal orientation of the probe being continually
fed back to the computer by digital position encoders. These data
were stored electronically, on 8-inch (20 cm) diameter magnetic
disks, along with the echo return times for the ultrasonic pulses
emitted by each of the twelve piezoelectric transducers at each
0.9-degree rotational step, and each 1-inch (2.5 cm) vertical step.
|
Although the system was wholly novel, it had to be reliable. Once
the measurements began on the scheduled day, they had to go without
any serious hitch. Backups could be, and were, at hand for all the
components outside the containment building. But the maintainablility
of the components inside the containment building was nearly nil—think
of fiddling with electronic equipment while wearing the anticontamination
clothing shown in Figure 5.1. The system was therefore put together
out of components of established reliability and went through a
rigorous testing program.
The sonar probe was tested at INEEL in a water-filled pit about
the same size as the upper third of the TMI-2 core, into which objects
simulating TMI-2 core components had been placed. In order to test
system operability using existing cabling at TMI, and under conditions
of electrical noise that could exist there, a kilometer of #14 wire
was put together by buying up all the heavy-duty extension cord
that could be found in eastern Idaho, and then arranging it to provide
maximum opportunity for interference. Finally, the work platform
above the TMI-2 reactor was mocked up, and installation moves choreographed
in complete anticontamination clothing.
|